### When Is an Ellipse Not an Ellipse?

Let's get the potentially controversial part of this out of the way: Ellipse is a misnomer when it comes to the Patek Philippe references 3788, 3930 and related versions. More specifically, the watch case in these designs is not rendered in the geometrical version of an ellipse that is frequently taught in high school. I'm honestly a little embarrassed to have only recently come to this conclusion, but geometry was never my strong suit. I won't take all the blame. In most discussions of the Ellipse (the watch), inevitably the "golden ratio" comes up. I think I was distracted by that, because the golden ratio is a pretty interesting topic. Nevertheless, I'd like to set the record straight, or at least straighter, with this post.

An ellipse is basically an oblong shape. Compared to a canonical ellipse, the Patek Ellipse has sides that are too straight leading to "corners" that arch too quickly. Real ellipses are also defined by an equation, like:
${x}^{2}+{\left(\frac{y}{2.75}\right)}^{2}=1$
A graph of this equation is below. As I'll show in just a bit, the case profile of the Ellipse watch is also defined by an equation, but it is meaningfully different from an actual ellipse. The Cartier Bagnoire is much closer to an ellipse than the Patek Ellipse.

I came to this realization after flipping through the pages of a 1992 Patek catalogue I received as a holiday gift. There, I saw a designer's drawing of the Ellipse watch, which I share here. I'd never seen this drawing before. It features a crosshair at the center surrounded by four overlapping circles. I later learned that these four overlapping circles are called a quatrefoil, a shape that is important in a number of religions. Some claim that in Christianity it represents the four gospel authors in the Bible. The design also appears in mosques. Van Cleef and Arpels famously adopted a quatrefoil in their Alhambra bracelet.

I spent a bit of time trying to figure out how a combination of the quatrefoil and the golden ratio could result in the case design we find in the Ellipse. That effort, by and large, went nowhere. I will note that the quatrefoil drawing presented in the 1992 Patek catalogue does lend credence to the claim on John Riordan's Collectibility that one possible designer of the Patek Ellipse was inspired by the interwoven "cloverleaf" offramp pattern frequently featured on American highways.

I began to turn my attention away from the quatrefoil / golden rule and started concentrating on the end result of the design. The Ellipse is basically a rectangle with rounded corners and curved edges. The shape was vaguely familiar. It looks like a very early tube television. In fact, some software refers to this design as the "TV Screen Shape." Eventually, I identified the actual shape of the Ellipse because I'd discussed it in an earlier post on the shape of wrists. It is a LamÃ© Curve, also known as a superellipse.

Gabriel LamÃ© was a 19th century mathematician who made significant contributions to the field of partial differential equations. In 1818 he offered the first known analysis of his eponymous curve, which was later dubbed a "superellipse" by Dutch polymath Piet Hein. In 1959, planners in Stockholm, Sweden held a competition for the redesign of a downtown public square. Hein's proposal for a LamÃ© curve (superellipse) fountain won the competition. The fountain stands to this day (see photo). It bears a striking resemblance to the Ellipse reference 3748, in which diamond hour markers evoke the circular "windows" at the base of Hein's fountain.

Interestingly, it is entirely possible that Patek's Ellipse designer was inspired by Hein's fountain, rather than the golden ratio. The timing is consistent. Hein's design was presented to Stockholm planners in 1960. The Patek Ellipse debuted in 1968.

Regardless, once I realized the Patek Ellipse followed a LamÃ© curve (superellipse), I decided I'd try to "reverse engineer" the equation behind the Patek Ellipse case. Here is what I settled on:
${\left|\frac{x}{2.4}\right|}^{2.617}+{\left|\frac{y}{2.75}\right|}^{2.617}=1$
In the image presented here, you can see that the gaph of the above equation matches a photo of the Patek Ellipse almost perfectly. You can also see that the actual equation for the Ellipse watch is meaningfully different from the ellipse equation I presented earlier. Interestingly, we now know exactly where the golden ratio fits into the design of the Patek Ellipse. If you look in the exponent of the equation just above, it rounds to 2.62. This is one plus a rounded value of the golden ration (1.62).

It appears that marketers may have enjoyed some unconstrained freedom when naming and describing the design of the Patek Philippe Ellipse. Precision is important in engineering and horology, but calling a LamÃ© curve (superellipse) an ellipse muddies the waters. I can certainly understand why Patek did not want to call the watch the "LamÃ©," because doing so could lead to jokes among English speakers about how "lame" the watch is. The brand probably also took a pass on Superellipse because that is perhaps a little less "serious" than most reference names we typically see from the maison. It is fun, though, to note that the superellipse shape of the Ellipse case is a decent proxy for the actual shape of the human wrist in cross section, a point I make here. From that perspective, we can think of the Patek Ellipse as the opportunity to display wrist geometry atop your own wrist.
My book on the history of Rolex marketing is now available on Amazon! It debuted as the #1 New Release in its category. You can find it here.

You can subscribe to Horolonomics updates here.

1. This comment has been removed by the author.

### Argon Trademark Dispute Goes to Court

What it might look like if Aragon and Argon watches actually went to court over the trademark dispute. My prior post described a disappointing development for those collectors hoping to acquire an Argon Spaceone watch via the brand's Kickstarter campaign. The campaign had reached over \$1 million in funding when Kickstarter's management stepped in and froze the whole thing over an "intellectual property dispute." When I posted about this development on Instagram , Hodinkee editor Tony Traina noted in the comments that another brand, Aragon watches, had filed a complaint with the US Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) back in April (thanks Tony!). Argon's account replied and indicated that they had already filed a registration for their brand name and they were retaining counsel in New York City. On Tuesday, June 27 of this week, more details were offered via a lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case is filed on behalf

### The History of Rolex, Tudor and Motorsports in Japan

Rolex's relationship with automotive racing is, at this point, very well-established. A Tudor sponsored car taking the checkered flag in Japan. A clearer photo is later in the post. Formula 1 and Rolex marked a decade of official partnership this year. One of the brand's most successful designs is named after a famous race: the Daytona (500). And, the record-setting Paul Newman Rolex Daytona which sold at auction in 2017 was worn by Newman during his illustrious career on the race track. In this post I will detail a lesser-known relationship between Rolex and automotive racing. In the 1960's through the 1970's, Tudor and Rolex sponsored at least one race car in Japan. I initially learned about this sponsorship through my conversation with Elias, which was also the basis for my prior post on Tudor. While I am not the first to write on the subject of Rolex/Tudor auto racing in Japan (for example, see the posts here and here ), I believe this post will be one of th

### In-House Means In Control

Among many avid watch collectors, the term "in house movement" seems to elicit eyerolling disdain. Pieces of an assortment, including balance spring, from a non-Swiss movement. There is a sizeable perception that "in house" is, in fact, nothing more than an unnecessary marketing ploy designed to tease more money out of the wallet of buyers (by way of definition, an "in house" movement means that the mechanism inside a watch was predominently manufactured by a brand itself, kind of like "we make our own bread" at a restaurant). I'll confess that I'd begun to think similarly, that is, until I read a 66 page report posted by the Swiss Competition Commision on May 10, 2023. Yes, this is the kind of thing an economist finds interesting on a weekend, or at least this economist. Before we get into the details of this report, in the interest of full disclosure I should say that the original document was in a different language: lawyerese.