I recently learned that the CEO of Audemars Piguet Americas (APA), Ginny Wright, was departing the legendary watch brand. A tabletop model of the AP "Starwheel," photo taken at AP House NYC. The new CEO of AP Americaa will be Louis-Gabriel Fichet, who joined AP in 2020. I learned about this development from an online watch publication whose editor opined on the matter. I feel obliged to respond to that piece because I think it reveals some concerning biases in watch industry coverage, biases which will only diminish if we talk about them openly and honestly.
There were three critiques of Ms. Wright's time at the helm of APA that jumped out to me. First was the allegation that Ms. Wright suffered a "sudden removal." Subsequent to this critique, Ms. Wright posted on her Instagram account that she is "returning to the world of prestige beauty and stepping into a global CEO role." Moving from a regional executive position to a global one is not indicative of a "sudden removal." Rather, it's a natural move which probably involved headhunters of some sort who matched Ms. Wright to her new job. If true, that suggests Ms. Wright was recruited out of AP, not pushed out. As I write this, the original post about Ms. Wright's departure has not been updated with this new bit of information.
The second allegation regarding Ms. Wright is that she "failed to understand" AP's business and instead made APA "all about celebrities." The "failed to understand" critique is concerningly aligned with gender stereotypes assigning "brilliance" and "genius" to men rather than women. In my mind, there is no evidence that Ms. Wright did not understand AP's business model and the critic did not present any compelling evidence to support his claim. While it is certainly true that AP involves celebrities in their marketing, that approach predated Ms. Wright, continued during her tenure, and continues to this day with initiatives out of AP headquarters in Le Brassus. For example, AP partnered with Arnold Schwartzenegger on many different watches well before Ms. Wright joined APNA (see, for example, this one). John Meyer's appointment as Creative Conduit for AP was undoubtedly a decision made out of headquarters (I have no doubt Ms. Wright was involved in that process but I do doubt that she alone made that decision). Former AP employee Michael Friedman was name checked by Kendrick Lamar in one of his songs, another AP celebrity connection which probably had little to do with Ms. Wright. Lamar released "Rich Spirit" when Ms. Wright had only been in her position 18 months. It is certainly possible that Ms. Wright cultivated a friendship between Friedman and Lamar during those months to the point where Lamar decided to include Friedman's name (rather than Wright's name) in a track, but I very much doubt it.
The third critique involved APNA's decision to relocate its service center from Florida to North Carolina. An AP pocket watch, photo taken at AP's museum. I wrote about this decision back in 2023. I don't think anyone has any basis to determine whether this move is good or bad. There is data showing that home insurance costs in North Carolina are about half those of Florida. So any home owning APA employee who moves can likely save money by leaving Florida. And, North Carolina provided some nice revenues to AP in order to induce the move. Those monies include financial training incentives from the state and a Business Investment Grant from the city of Raleigh. My point is that there are some important upsides to the move.
I was curious about whether the relocation had been cancelled in light of all the critiques above. I do not believe that is the case. In June, AP advertised multiple jobs in North Carolina, including watchmakers, human resources, and client-facing positions. If they had cancelled the move then I would say there is some evidence that APNA had perhaps stumbled. But they seem to be going ahead with the plan (I reached out to AP for comment on this piece and the new service center but as of this writing they have not responded).
In short, I do not believe the current critiques leveled at Ms. Wright are accurate, fair or defendible. I do believe it is fair to criticize, but I do not believe it is fair to rely on tropes, scapegoat, and inaccurately hypothesize. In 2023, women occupied only 8.2% of CEO positions at companies in the S & P 500. There is no reasonable basis for this under-representation other then bias. We should all be aware of that fact when we consider industry developments.
My book on the history of Rolex marketing is now available on Amazon! It debuted as the #1 New Release in its category. You can find it here.
Let's get some preliminaries out of the way: I don't particularly admire or respect how Patek CEO Thierry Stern responded to criticism of Cubitus, the brand's newest release. Three pocket watches on display during the 2017 Patek Philippe Grand Exhibition in NYC. Here's what he said : “The haters are mostly people who have never had a Patek and never will, so that doesn’t bother me.” Does this remark seem filled with hubris and disrespect for potential buyers? Yes. Will it matter for Patek financially? I don't think so. Let me explain. In order to understand the financial side of watch brands, we should never forget that retail buyers are not their customers (with some rare exceptions). I know that sounds crazy, but it is 5,000% true. For a brand like Patek, the primary watch market is financially mediated. There is a third party standing between brands in Switzerland and collectors. Namely, Patek sells to authorized dealers, they don't sell to collectors....
While listening to a recent episode of the A Blog to Watch Weekly podcast, a debate over strategy and pricing at the watch brand Oris caught my attention. An Oris watch. The brand has used Sellita movements. The issue at hand was this: do Oris Diver watches, featuring the in-house calibre 400 movement and priced just over $4,000, make any sense? This question is relevant because other, similar, Oris Divers with a Sellita-derived movement are available for under $3,000. At first blush, I understand and, to some extent, agree with those who question whether it makes sense for Oris to move "upmarket" and still offer lower-priced models. But I think some recent events in Switzerland suggest that buyers should strongly consider, or perhaps prefer, the newer references with in-house movements even though they may carry a premium. When any brand sources materials from other companies, they face something the field of finance refers to as "counterparty risk." Your p...
Late last year, I had a chance to visit a truly special space in the United States: the workshop of an independent American watchmaker. Lovell Hunter showing components on a bench in his workshop. Photo Credit: Lovell Hunter's YouTube channel. I've written about Lovell Hunter before, I posted my first story about Lovell right here on Horolonomics. There, I described his career as a watchmaker for Breitling and his decisions to strike out on his own and launch an independent brand called Love Hunter Watches. Lovell and I have kept in touch since then and he periodically reaches out to share updates on the progress of his watch design as well as other updates regarding his brand. At one point, Lovell invited me to visit his workshop, which is located in Connecticut's Naugatuck River Valley. The location couldn't be more appropriate given that "Brass City," aka Waterbury, is located on the northern portion of the valley. Brass has historically, and presen...
Comments
Post a Comment