Of late it appears that the Kering group is steadly withdrawing resources from watchmaking.
Gucci's watchmaking office in Switzerland. Source: Google Earth. Kering owns Gucci and a number of other brands. In January of 2022, word broke that Kering had jettisoned Ulysse Nardin and Girard-Perregaux. Management acquired ownership and has been operating the brands since then (unless there was another, subsequent, private party sale of ownership stakes).
The most recent step on the path to a reduction in Kering's watchmaking footprint appears to involve Gucci Watchmaking. News broke last week that Gucci's watchmaking office in Cortaillod, Switzerland has notified the trade union for watchmaking that the brand would like to dismiss 25 employees. The brand and the union have started negotiations regarding the possible layoffs.
Such steps are usually the last that a business will take, typically only under the most challenging and fraught financial circumstances. As I wrote not long ago, Switzerland offers a program in which the government will cover part of an employee's pay while a business temporarily reduces their hours of work and the amount that the business pays. This program, RHT, does have a limit on how long an employee can collect supplementary pay. Once that limit is reached, a business may begin looking at termination of employment.
In my prior post on RHT, I discussed the possibility that many watch industry employees may be towards the end of their RHT benefit. It remains to be seen if Gucci's watchmaking division is just the "leading edge" of more layoffs that will spread to other brands as additional employees reach the end of the RHT benefit. Even under such circumstances, there are still ways to avoid these layoffs, though, which includes a lengthening of the RHT benefit's eligibility period.
It isn't necessarily the case that Gucci's struggles are emblematic of common challenges throughout the watchmaking industry. Howeover, the brand is certainly a player in advanced watchmaking. Take, for example, the 25H Minute Repeater, a timepiece with two of the more advanced complications in high horology (a tourbillon and a minute repeater). One of the bigger risks in going down the road of layoffs is that the skilled craftspeople who can create such timepieces may shift to other industries, resulting in a longer-run shortage in the supply of watchmaking skills. Hopefully, a change in government policy or sales would avoid that kind of thing. We will undoubtedly learn more in coming months.
My book on the history of Rolex marketing is now available on Amazon! It debuted as the #1 New Release in its category. You can find it here.
Let's get some preliminaries out of the way: I don't particularly admire or respect how Patek CEO Thierry Stern responded to criticism of Cubitus, the brand's newest release. Three pocket watches on display during the 2017 Patek Philippe Grand Exhibition in NYC. Here's what he said : “The haters are mostly people who have never had a Patek and never will, so that doesn’t bother me.” Does this remark seem filled with hubris and disrespect for potential buyers? Yes. Will it matter for Patek financially? I don't think so. Let me explain. In order to understand the financial side of watch brands, we should never forget that retail buyers are not their customers (with some rare exceptions). I know that sounds crazy, but it is 5,000% true. For a brand like Patek, the primary watch market is financially mediated. There is a third party standing between brands in Switzerland and collectors. Namely, Patek sells to authorized dealers, they don't sell to collectors....
This may not come as a surprise, but I do not read German-language newspapers on a regular basis. Dial of a vintage Omega Constellation, pie pan. I am, however, keenly interested in a scandal involving the Swatch Group and a "Frankenwatch" Speedmaster which was sold at auction a while back for over $3 million. I won't go into all the minute details here, but the punchline is that Swatch Group bought the watch only to discover that some of its own employees may have been part of a conspiracy to assemble a watch which would be quite rare and important if it were authentic. But, apparently, it was not authentic. When the deception was uncovered, various people who were part of the "inside job" lost employment and, reportedly, legal authorities were notified in Switzerland. I originally wrote about this in 2023, you can read my coverage here . There's been excellent reporting on this matter from many sources (see, for example, this story from Bloomberg). ...
While listening to a recent episode of the A Blog to Watch Weekly podcast, a debate over strategy and pricing at the watch brand Oris caught my attention. An Oris watch. The brand has used Sellita movements. The issue at hand was this: do Oris Diver watches, featuring the in-house calibre 400 movement and priced just over $4,000, make any sense? This question is relevant because other, similar, Oris Divers with a Sellita-derived movement are available for under $3,000. At first blush, I understand and, to some extent, agree with those who question whether it makes sense for Oris to move "upmarket" and still offer lower-priced models. But I think some recent events in Switzerland suggest that buyers should strongly consider, or perhaps prefer, the newer references with in-house movements even though they may carry a premium. When any brand sources materials from other companies, they face something the field of finance refers to as "counterparty risk." Your p...
Comments
Post a Comment