Skip to main content


Hey, remember me? Regrettably I've allowed Horolonomics to lay fallow for too long, since earlier this summer really.  I can't exactly explain why, but it is fair to say that the pandemic is at least partially responsible.  I've had quite a few articles I've wanted to post in the interim, but I'm finally awakening from my temporary hibernation in response to pending developments at HODINKEE.

As I explained in my interview over at Watchsignals (full disclosure: I'm an official advisor), the good people at HODINKEE set me upon my path as an enthusiast and collector of watches.  I can't exactly remember when I started reading it, I think it was when Kevin Rose joined the team, probably around 2015.  I'd used his first startup "recommendation engine," Digg, and listened to his podcast for a while (Diggnation, which was really fun) and that is when HODINKEE popped on my radar.  

It is fair to say that a great deal of the emergent interest in watch collecting is attributable to the work HODINKEE has done under the leadership of Ben Clymer. 
Ben Clymer during HODINKEE's H10 event.
So, I'm posting this because it sure looks like that arrangement is very significantly changing.  To be clear: I'd thought this day would inevitably arrive.  Venture capital funded enterprise almost always involves sidelining founders, usually after giving them a good chunk of payoff (this may or may not be what is happening).  I actually marveled at the fact that Clymer was able to maintain his position for so long. This is approximately his twelfth year with the company, an eon in the VC world.   Perhaps the pandemic rendered the arrangement unsustainable, though.  The term "runway" is often used in reference to the pool of funding available to a VC enterprise as it operates in the red during its early days.  It seems the runway grew short, the pool of funding was tapped, and one of the conditions of new funding involved a new CEO.

I believe this to be the case based upon an article posted and then retracted by Watchpro on the morning of December 1.  You can find it in Google's cache (also archived here).  Watchpro reports that a pool of funders (including Tom Brady and John Mayer) have extended $40 million of additional runway to HODINKEE.  I have reason to believe that this article is accurate and this news will come out eventually.  The new CEO bundled with the funding is reportedly Mr. Porter founder Toby Bateman.  

So, let's break down the good and the bad.  The good: HODINKEE stays alive to fight another day.  Who knows, maybe Mr. Bateman is immensely talented and he will do great things that we all appreciate.  It is hard to say without having some additional details.

The bad: there is a risk that HODINKEE will not be able to keep its non-commercial (i.e. writing) talent team whole during all these changes.  Also, will the new CEO capably keep Mr. Clymer fully engaged in the enterprise?  Much of this might depend upon vesting arrangements for stock options.  

My chief concern is that the VCs will see the future for HODINKEE as an ecommerce acquisition target and inadequately support the publishing side of the house.  In fact, I think this is a real possibility.  One of the most valuable assets for the brand is the AD arrangements HODINKEE has assembled.  I can easily imagine a luxury conglomerate or a retail network with a weak online commerce game seeing HODINKEE as a route to leapfrogging the competition. 

There is nothing inherently wrong with that endgame.  It is important, though, to note that HODINKEE has filled the important role of building enthusiasm and interest for the watch community as a whole.  In this sense, the company has provided a "public good" of education and interest-building which benefits all the players, including and especially the brands.  A good example was Hodinkee's H10 event celebrating its 10th anniversary. This was essentially a free conference for the community and industry to gather and dialogue.
The program for the H10 event.
Venture capitalists subsidized that public good for many years.  If those days are numbered will the community lose this public good?  If that happens, what is the implication for the wider watch community?   We will have to wait and see.


  1. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. I am really thank full for you for this post. luxury watches online USA.

  2. Just discovered your blog and as a geek myself could resist wandering the back catalog. I havent done the research required to be sure of this but it appears you may have been prescient regarding the effect of this on writing talent. Around (and I believe after?) the time you wrote this a few of the more senior staff writers at Hodinkee left and were replaced by younger and/or less specialised (cheaper?) writers.

  3. I really appreciate your blog post about economic complications in watchmaking. I have a blog and have been struggling to come up with the right amount of content for it. I'm excited to try some of the things you mentioned in your blog post like posting a comment on other people's blog or creating an iframe. I'm also excited about your plan for the future of your blog and look forward to seeing what you have in store.Promotional Products

  4. DumpsBuddy ISA Exam ISA-IEC-62443 Dumps have similar promising features and are helpful ISA-IEC-62443 Cybersecurity Fundamentals Specialist pdf dumps answers to know the most significant topics of the exam.

  5. CertsTopics offers ECCouncil Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEHv12) real exam questions and practice test engine with real questions and verified answers. Try Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEHv12) exam questions for free. You can also download a free PDF demo of ECCouncil Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEHv12) exam. Our Certified Ethical Hacker Exam (CEHv12) Combo Package for which includes PDF (Printable Format) and Testing Engine (Works on Windows and MAC) which ensures you to go through all certification topics and provides you ultimate satisfaction to pass your exam in your first attempt.
    ECCouncil Ethical Hacker 312-50v12 Exam (CEHv12)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Argon Trademark Dispute Goes to Court

What it might look like if Aragon and Argon watches actually went to court over the trademark dispute. My prior post described a disappointing development for those collectors hoping to acquire an Argon Spaceone watch via the brand's Kickstarter campaign. The campaign had reached over $1 million in funding when Kickstarter's management stepped in and froze the whole thing over an "intellectual property dispute." When I posted about this development on Instagram , Hodinkee editor Tony Traina noted in the comments that another brand, Aragon watches, had filed a complaint with the US Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) back in April (thanks Tony!). Argon's account replied and indicated that they had already filed a registration for their brand name and they were retaining counsel in New York City. On Tuesday, June 27 of this week, more details were offered via a lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case is filed on behalf

In-House Means In Control

Among many avid watch collectors, the term "in house movement" seems to elicit eyerolling disdain. Pieces of an assortment, including balance spring, from a non-Swiss movement. There is a sizeable perception that "in house" is, in fact, nothing more than an unnecessary marketing ploy designed to tease more money out of the wallet of buyers (by way of definition, an "in house" movement means that the mechanism inside a watch was predominently manufactured by a brand itself, kind of like "we make our own bread" at a restaurant). I'll confess that I'd begun to think similarly, that is, until I read a 66 page report posted by the Swiss Competition Commision on May 10, 2023. Yes, this is the kind of thing an economist finds interesting on a weekend, or at least this economist. Before we get into the details of this report, in the interest of full disclosure I should say that the original document was in a different language: lawyerese.

Has Swatch Encountered Diminishing Returns?

They say a picture is worth a thousand words, but I'm not sure it is worth a thousand points of data. My Mission to Mars MoonSwatch and Fifty Fathoms homage by Steeldive. The pictures from the last 10 days or so suggest that Swatch has delivered another blockbuster by way of their most recent "collaboration" with Blancpain, this one officially known as the Bioceramic Scuba Fifty Fathoms (SFF). Social media served up numerous photos of queues outside of Swatch stores ahead of the SFF launch on September 9. Plenty of aspiring owners waited long hours for their chance to buy the newest accessible riff on a design that typically commands a price in the five digit range. I'll admit that the photos convinced me that Swatch has a replicable formula for developing watches that are so in demand they can be flipped for a sizable premium. As I've done before, though, I prefer to ask the data what, exactly, is going on with the release of this timepiece. And the data