Skip to main content

Thoughts on the Vacheron Constantin Concours d'Élégance Horlogère

I admit that when I first read about the Vacheron Constantin Concours d’Élégance Horlogère I did not understand the concept.
Maybe that isn't entirely accurate. I understood parts of the concept, like the fact that it is an official collaboration between a brand and the watch department at auction house Phillips. And, it was clear that the concours will award prizes to registered participants. There is also a jury.

The prizes part had me stumped, though. I guess I didn't understand why owning a watch would somehow qualify you for a prize. In retrospect, I misunderstood what the prizes were for (more on that in a minute). Additionally, I think I've figured out that I didn't understand this effort because I am not a car collector or enthusiast.
There were a number of pieces from a heritage private collection on display during a recent concours event.
In that world, owners of vintage cars can participate in somewhat regular events and win awards. Many honors go to sought-after vehicles that have, possibly, been restored. Initially, I hadn't made the logical connection between car show competitions and the Vacheron X Phillips concours, but I now believe that connection is there.

I recently attended an event, hosted by Phillips in New York City, which helped me finally understand a sort of equivalence between a car collector councours and the Vacheron X Phillips effort.
Another Private Heritege piece, this with an enamel dial.
For me, it boils down to this: when a brand has been producing watches for 270 years there are a lot of variations of a lot of timekeepers in a wide range of condition. It would be hard for any brand to fully understand the entire production history of timepieces and the extent to which those timepieces have been restored or repaired. Vacheron has a renowned historical archive. Still, there are reasons to believe that the brand will learn valuable information by opening the door to collectors and asking them to bring their watches for a conversation. And, the flow of information goes in the other direction too. Interacting with knowledgeable brand team members can potentially help owners better understand their own collection.

A couple of moments from the Phillips event might help illustrate this point.
A Vacheron watchmaker discussing a pocket watch with collectors.
At the center of the room were tables headed by watchmakers from Vacheron. Collectors were invited to bring their pieces to the table and have a conversation with a watchmaker. I stood and listened to a couple conversations, one about a vintage pocket watch from the U. S. Corps of Engineers and another about a unique jump hour timepiece in precious metal. What I found interesting was the fact that the exchange between watchmaker and collector seemed mutually beneficial. Watchmakers could speak to details like movement architecture and case materials.
A Vacheron pocket watch from the US Corps of Engineers.
And, collectors have often thought a lot about what they are purchasing and why, including a fair bit of research into a particular reference and any of its unique characteristics. Both conversation participants seemed to learn from each other.

The conversations betwee watchmakers and collectors was not something I had anticipated and, for me, this seems to be the most important part of the concours. I've had the opportunity to talk with watchmakers at a number of events but usually I did not have much to bring to the table.
A Vacheron ref. 43040 in platinum with jump hour.
The concours event is quite clever, though, because it serves as an opportunity for Vacheron and the brand's watchmakers to, potentially, learn from a dedicated community of collectors. In many ways it is a natural progression from events like Rolliefest in which the collector community gathers. But with the concouors, official brand representatives are there too. I was left wondering how the heritage team at Vacheron might end up benefitting from the registration of all those vintage timepieces. What kind of connections could they draw between participating timepieces and the brand's archives? Would any threads emerge which would, when pulled, reveal new information about one of the "holy trinity" of watchmakers?

I came away from the Phillips X Vacheron event thinking that the Concours d’Élégance Horlogère might play a role beyond awards and celebration. While those are certainly valuable from a marketing perspective, it is the potential for growth in understanding of heritage, and enthusiasm for collecting, which has me most curious. My hope is that we might see more such events in the future. I'm cautiously optimistic that we will.

The deadline to submit a timepiece to the Vacheron Constantin Concours d’Élégance Horlogère is April 30, you can learm more at this link.
My book on the history of Rolex marketing is now available on Amazon! It debuted as the #1 New Release in its category. You can find it here.

You can subscribe to Horolonomics updates here.

Comments

  1. Really interesting perspective on how collecting becomes more meaningful through shared knowledge and experience. It’s a reminder that passion and curiosity can teach a lot, much like the journeys of famous people who didn't go to college and learned through real-world experiences.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I enjoyed reading your thoughts on Vacheron Constantin because it shows how much craftsmanship and attention to detail matter in any field. The same level of patience is often needed by students working on HNC assignment writing help related tasks where quality and structure make a real difference. Discussions around design simplify also reminded me how clear presentation can improve both creative and academic work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rolex v Icebox

Last week, Icebox / Swiss Watches GA, a third party retailer of pre-owned watches, officially acknowledged receipt of a lawsuit filed by Rolex USA in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia - Atlanta Division. A screenshot of the Icebox / Swiss Watches GA retail location Source: Rolex's legal filing. The cause of action for Rolex's lawsuit against Icebox / Swiss Watches GA is "Trademark Counterfeiting, Trademark Infringement, False Advertising, Designation of Origin, Descriptions, Representations, and Unfair Competition." I've previously covered lawsuits of this sort filed by Rolex against independent retailers who sell modified watches. But this one is an order of magnitude different. Icebox / Swiss Watches GA has some very high-profile clientele. For example, a YouTube video from five years ago entitled "Post Malone Buys Rolex For 21 Savage & Autographs A Bugatti!" has over seven million views (the video content is pretty ...

The Path to Rolex's Land Dweller Winds Through Tudor

We're certainly not suffering from a shortage of coverage when it comes to Rolex's recent launch of an entirely new product line: the Land-Dweller reference 127334 (steel, there are also precious metal versions). I've read much of this coverage and I will do my best not to repeat it here. Instead, I hope to share a few takes that you may not have seen elsewhere, including evidence that the watch's design heritage extends in directions that are overlooked. So let's get into it. To begin, the Land-Dweller is undoubtedly attributable to the leadership of CEO Jean-Frédéric Dufour, who took the reigns of the brand in the summer of 2015. According to an expose by Bloomberg (more on that later), development of the Land-Dweller began roughly five years ago, a handful of years after Dufour took over. There have been many, equally significant releases by Rolex of late. For example, 2023's "emoji" Day-Date was arguably a bigger "mic drop" than the Lan...

Bias in Coverage of AP Leadership Change?

I recently learned that the CEO of Audemars Piguet Americas (APA), Ginny Wright, was departing the legendary watch brand. A tabletop model of the AP "Starwheel," photo taken at AP House NYC. The new CEO of AP Americaa will be Louis-Gabriel Fichet, who joined AP in 2020. I learned about this development from an online watch publication whose editor opined on the matter . I feel obliged to respond to that piece because I think it reveals some concerning biases in watch industry coverage, biases which will only diminish if we talk about them openly and honestly. There were three critiques of Ms. Wright's time at the helm of APA that jumped out to me. First was the allegation that Ms. Wright suffered a "sudden removal." Subsequent to this critique, Ms. Wright posted on her Instagram account that she is "returning to the world of prestige beauty and stepping into a global CEO role." Moving from a regional executive position to a global one is not ind...