Last week, I finished user onboarding with a service called CrowdTangle, a
startup that launched in 2012. In 2016, Facebook acquired CrowdTangle. In 2019,
it opened a service for academic researchers. I recently applied to participate
and I was accepted. CrowdTangle provides a wide array of analytic data for
activity on Facebook and Instagram. I'm only beginning to familiarize myself
with it. Out of curiosity, I decided to get my bearings by looking through the
platform's data on watch media. The insights I'm posting here are the result.
CrowdTangle's engine reports a wide range of information on public posts and
accounts, including followers, reactions (likes, etc), shares and commenting. I
began by building a list of the major watch media outlets which have been
operating for a fair number of years. I requested feedback on Instagram for my
initial list and updated it accordingly (thank you to everyone who commented,
acknowledgements below).
I ended up with a list of 16 outlets (see figure).The brands forming the sample. If you are an industry
professional or enthusiast, I think the group will be familiar. I acknowledge that there are also many "new new media" outlets that are extremely
important voices (podcasters, newsletters and the like). I will probably publish
a second piece discussing that ecosystem in the very near future.
I decided to pull analytic data for Instagram. Conveniently, the watch community is
quite active on this particular platform, so it is fair to say that evidence from
Instagram activity is important. However, since watch media rely upon a wide
array of platforms (including websites, RSS, podcasts and now potentially even
Clubhouse) I've decided to report results without attaching the name of an
outlet to any particular piece of data. I think this will help avoid inferences
like, "watch publication X is ranked Y in audience size." There are limitations
to the data I have available. They don't present a complete picture of audience
and attention.
With those caveats in place, let's begin. Two year timeline of watch media IG interactions.I'm going to rely on "interactions" as
a proxy for attention to an outlet's Instagram account. CrowdTangle defines
interactions as a weighted sum of responses after an account makes a post (responses are reactions, comments and shares). I pulled the interactions data for two years across these
16 outlets. Let's first discuss the "forest," i. e. the overall picture for watch media. Monthly total IG interactions for the industry between
May, 2019 and April, 2021 are presented in the attached figure. The average
across these 24 months was approximately 774,000. I ran the numbers and there is
no statistically significant trend, positive or negative, to the volume of
attention paid to these watch media on Instagram. I believe this is an important
first result. It suggests that watch media are not benefitting from more intense
attention from Instagram users and / or an expansion of the number of Instagram
users paying attention to watch media. I'll return to this result below.
Let's next consider the lore surrounding the pandemic and the watch industry. I've
read commentary by many individuals
suggesting
that interest in watches was on an upswing through the pandemic, perhaps due to
the fact that household entertainment budgets could not be spent on travel,
restaurants, or other public leisure activities. I do not find evidence
supporting this claim in the Instagram data. From March, 2020 through the end of
the year, there was no statistically significant increase in interactions with
watch media on Instagram (perhaps not a surprise given that I also can not
find evidence of an overall positive trend in the data).
There was an upswing in interest at the immediate onset of the pandemic: peak
interactions took place in April, 2020. Monthly interaction totals, descreasing sort.What the data shows, though, is that
this bump was short-run in nature. There may be a historical explanation for this uptick. Typically, the Baselworld trade fair took place in the
March / April timeframe. Increased attention in these months might simple
reflect a habit on the part of the watch community. The fact that April, 2021
registered the second-highest level of Instagram interaction with watch media
is also consistent with the "trade show" hypothesis. The virtual watch trade
show "Watches and Wonders" took place April 7-13, 2021.
Now let's peek at the trees populating the watch media forest. The distribution of watch media interaction on IG. What is the
distribution of interactions across outlets? Here, I present a histogram of
interactions. It does not follow a normal distribution. Instead, it
skews right and has a "long tail" with one outlet, in particular, gaining a lot
of Instagram attention. That outlet has 5X the total interactions of the average
for the 16 outlets. It's two nearest competitors for attention attract roughly
40% of its interactions. There is also a collection of 12 outlets clustered
closely together in close proximity to the median of the attention distribution.
Overall, it would be fair to describe the watch media industry as competitive
when it comes to Instagram user interactions. In the Industrial Organization
economics literature, there is a commonly used measure of competition called the
HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). It is computed from market share figures.
Ideally, I would calculate a revenue HHI for these outlets but since almost all
of them are private enterprises, this isn't possible. I calculated an
Instagram attention HHI, instead, which yields a value of 1,616. According to
the
Antitrust Division
of the U. S. Department of Justice, HHI values between the range of 1,500 and
5,000 suggests an industry which is "moderately concentrated" although watch media interactions are at the very low end of such concentration. If we included "new new media," it is quite likely the HHI would indicate a competitive industry.
A second indicator of competitiveness is "convergence." Do the outlets with
lower levels of IG interactions show any indication that they might "catch up"
with the top tier of outlets? The answer to this question is yes. Trend in individual outlet IG interactions, each line is an account.
The figure
here is a "spaghetti diagram" of monthly IG interactions as a percent of
interactions at the start of the sample. For example, the outlet with the
highest total number of interactions ended the sample at 1.04 on the chart. This
implies that their interactions in that month were 4% higher than they were at
the outset of the sample. The chart shows that there were 8 outlets that
expanded their IG interactions at the end of the sample by more than 4%. If this
pattern persisted, these eight lower ranked outlets would continue to catch up
with the top ranked outlet. There is, therefore, a second indicator that the watch
media industry is highly competitive.
Conclusion
In summary, CrowdTangle data on Instagram interactions suggests the
following regarding watch media and the watch industry:
There is no evidence that the pandemic increased watch media attention on Instagram.
There is no evidence that attention to watch media on Instagram is trending (neither positively nor negatively).
There is evidence suggesting that trade shows drive greater attention to watch media.
Watch media are weakly concentrated and show signs of convergence among outlets.
These results have a few implications for watch media and the watch industry. Generally speaking, if a "pie" of some sort is not growing, one person's slice can only expand at the cost of a smaller slice for someone else. Instagram interaction statistics suggest this is the kind of "business stealing" competition we see at play in watch media. Further, static attention to watch media on Instagram is likely not the ideal situation for brands. Other things equal, the watch industry would no doubt prefer that watch media enhance understanding and interest in watch collecting. The results presented here suggest trade shows may be one method to increase attention.
Generally speaking, collectors should be encouraged by these results. Consumers usually benefit from intense competition, although such competition can make it far more difficult for watch media outlets to thrive. I plan to explore alternatives which might address this challenge in coming posts.
Acknowledgements: I would like to thank Instagram accounts thewatchregulator, horology_ancienne, zkazan, cbradleytucker, biaoist, and redbar_bombay for feedback on my initial list of watch media outlets.
Thanks for publishing such great information. You are doing such a great job. This information is very helpful for everyone. Keep sharing about Rare Patek Philippe Watches and Pocket Watch. Thanks.
What it might look like if Aragon and Argon watches actually went to court over the trademark dispute. My prior post described a disappointing development for those collectors hoping to acquire an Argon Spaceone watch via the brand's Kickstarter campaign. The campaign had reached over $1 million in funding when Kickstarter's management stepped in and froze the whole thing over an "intellectual property dispute." When I posted about this development on Instagram , Hodinkee editor Tony Traina noted in the comments that another brand, Aragon watches, had filed a complaint with the US Patent and Trade Office (USPTO) back in April (thanks Tony!). Argon's account replied and indicated that they had already filed a registration for their brand name and they were retaining counsel in New York City. On Tuesday, June 27 of this week, more details were offered via a lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case is filed on behalf
Rolex's relationship with automotive racing is, at this point, very well-established. A Tudor sponsored car taking the checkered flag in Japan. A clearer photo is later in the post. Formula 1 and Rolex marked a decade of official partnership this year. One of the brand's most successful designs is named after a famous race: the Daytona (500). And, the record-setting Paul Newman Rolex Daytona which sold at auction in 2017 was worn by Newman during his illustrious career on the race track. In this post I will detail a lesser-known relationship between Rolex and automotive racing. In the 1960's through the 1970's, Tudor and Rolex sponsored at least one race car in Japan. I initially learned about this sponsorship through my conversation with Elias, which was also the basis for my prior post on Tudor. While I am not the first to write on the subject of Rolex/Tudor auto racing in Japan (for example, see the posts here and here ), I believe this post will be one of th
Among many avid watch collectors, the term "in house movement" seems to elicit eyerolling disdain. Pieces of an assortment, including balance spring, from a non-Swiss movement. There is a sizeable perception that "in house" is, in fact, nothing more than an unnecessary marketing ploy designed to tease more money out of the wallet of buyers (by way of definition, an "in house" movement means that the mechanism inside a watch was predominently manufactured by a brand itself, kind of like "we make our own bread" at a restaurant). I'll confess that I'd begun to think similarly, that is, until I read a 66 page report posted by the Swiss Competition Commision on May 10, 2023. Yes, this is the kind of thing an economist finds interesting on a weekend, or at least this economist. Before we get into the details of this report, in the interest of full disclosure I should say that the original document was in a different language: lawyerese.
Thanks for publishing such great information. You are doing such a great job. This information is very helpful for everyone. Keep sharing about Rare Patek Philippe Watches and Pocket Watch. Thanks.
ReplyDelete